ORIGINAL VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR
DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT, INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF
IN THIS PETITION FOR QUINTESSENTIAL RIGHTS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT
2.-BRIEF-IN-SUPPORT-OF-OVC-2-16-2017
3.-Index-List-of-Plaintiff’s-Exhibits
4.-Pursuant-to-Local-Rule-2.08
4.-RULE-5.1.-Notice-Constitutional-Challenge-to-Federal-Statute
5. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 2-21-2017
6.-Motion-to-Amend-Summons-2-21-2017
7.-MEMORANDUM-IN-SUPPORT-OF-AMENDED-SUMMONS
8.-MEMO-ORDER-of-JMB-2-23-2017-JOHN-BODENHAUSEN
11. NOTICE TO THE NATURE OF SUIT IN OPPOSITION TO
12 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE TO
12. EXH # T-9- I Am- in support of re 11
13. Doc No. 12 – MEMO IN SUPPORT OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE
13.a EXH # T-10 In the Nane of JESUS – ADDED BY DECLARATION
13.a EXH # U-7 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR Extension of Time
13.a FIRST DECLARATION OF HINDS
14. PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF OBJECTIONS & OPPOSITION TO re ECF No. 8
14a. EXH # U-8 No. 4 05 CV 1108 ERW 2006 Lawsuit
14a. EXH # U-8 USCOURTS-moed-4_05-cv-01853-1 case 6-6-06
15. NOTICE OF JUDICIAL ASSIGNMENT
15a. Contemporaneously Court Form attached to
16. ORDER of CJRA – 3-8-2017 New Judge- John A. Ross.
17. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Mokodean
18. COURT Memo & Order Judge JAR 3-10-2017
19. FIRST REQUEST FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RELIEF & MOTION
20. MOTION TO STRIKE ENTRY OF APPEARANCE & NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
20. MEMO & BRIEF in support of re 20. MOTION STRIKE
20.a Exhibit U-#10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Mokodean
20.a Exhibit U-#11 AO458 Appearance of Counsel
20.a Exhibit U-#12 Taxism – An Institutionalized Faith & Religion H-10
20.a Exhibit U-#13 Temple of Taxism – U S Tax Court H-11
20.a Exhibit U-#14 The Converts of THE-IRS- Taxprayers J-10
20.a Exhibit U-#15 Trial by Ordeal
20.a Exhibit U-#16 SECOND DECLARATION HINDS
21. Return Court Summons – DEFENDANTS & A.G.
23. NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBIT U-17
23.a Civil Docket Sheet Exhibit U #11 (4 pages)
24. PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST AND NOTICE FOR A HEARING DATE
24. THIRD DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
24.a NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBIT U-18
24.a T-2 [Mankind’s Supreme Possessions]
24.a T-3 As Architects of Religion and Religious Beliefs
24.a The House of David
25. NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT OF DOC. NO. 20
25.1 Exhibit U-#20 Face Sheet Bird page 1
25.a Exhibit U-#20 Bird of Prey page 2 & 3
26. NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBIT U-19 re (Doc. No. 22)
27. SECOND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
27.a – Exhibit U#24 – K-36 Black Theology of [Legalism] 2 pagers only
27.a NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT OF
27.a Exhibit U# 26 – B-1 First Amendment
27.a Exhibit U#21 – D- 3 Preamble
27.a Exhibit U#22 The Roles of a Federal District Court
27.a -Exhibit U#23- K-37 Black Theology of Legalism
27.a Exhibit U#25 – L-37 [To LIVE as EVIL] Wicked Law – Face sheet
27.a Exhibit U3#26 page 2 Exhibit Exhibition of Truth
27. a -Exhibit U#24- K-36 Black Theology of [Legalism]
28. FIRST NOTICE OF SHORT & PLAIN
29. COURT ORDER Judge JOHN ROSS 4-11-2017
30. PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF A MOTION AND REQUEST FOR A HEARING DATE
31. ORDER – Ross Disqualify himself
32. ORDER of CJRA – 5-5-2017 New Judge- Audrey Flessig
33.1 FIRST NOTICE OF UNJUST BURDENS
33.2 SECOND NOTICE OF UNJUST BURDENS
33.3 THIRD NOTICE OF UNJUST BURDENS
33.4 FOURTH NOTICE OF UNJUST BURDENS
33.5 FIFTH NOTICE OF UNJUST BURDENS
33.6 SIXTH NOTICE OF UNJUST BURDENS
33.7 SEVENTH NOTICE OF UNJUST BURDENS
34.1 FIRST NOTICE OF A SHORT AND PLAIN
34.2 SECOND NOTICE OF A SHORT AND PLAIN
34.3 THIRD NOTICE OF A SHORT AND PLAIN
34.4 FOURTH NOTICE OF A SHORT AND PLAIN
34.5 FIFTH NOTICE OF A SHORT AND PLAIN
34.6 SIXTH NOTICE OF A SHORT AND PLAIN
34.7 SEVENTH NOTICE OF A SHORT AND PLAIN
35. OPPORTUNITY TO PROPERLY PRESENT THE MERITS OF HIS ACTION
36. COURT Memo & Order Judge Flessig 5-12-2017 re. #35
37. A Refusal Letter From the Clerk of Court 5-23-2017
37. Clerk Refused to file -FIRST NOTICE OF JUDICIAL NOTICE #1
37. Refused by Clerk- Exhibit – U- 27 – DOJ Complaint 74 pages
37. Refused by Clerk- Exhibit – U- 28 Docket Sheet Case form 11-19-2011
37. Refused by Clerk- Exhibit – U- 29 Sanctions Imposable for Violations
37. Refused by Clerk- Exhibit – U- 30 – Exhibit List of Plaintiff
37. Refused by Clerk- Exhibit – U- 31 – Oaths of Judges
38. FIRST MOTION TO REVIEW, ALTER, AMEND, OR VACATE ORDERS
39. Exhibit Z#1 – MEMO & ORDER of JMB – attachment 1
39. Exhibit Z#2 – MEMO & ORDER of JAR – attachment 2
39. Exhibit Z#3 – ORDER ROSS 4-11-2017 – JAR – attachment 3
39. Exhibit Z#4 – Exhibit List of Plaintiff – attachment 4
39. Exhibit Z#5 – RULE 8 – 2006 Edition – attachment 5
39. Exhibit Z#6 – RULE 8 – 2016 Edition – attachment 6
39. MEMO OF LAW & BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF re 38
40. First Notice to Present the Merits of Action
41. Notice of Filing Exhibits re Doc. No. 40
42. Court Memo & Order Flessig 5-26-2017
43. FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT – Writ of Mandamus & Prohibition
43.a Exhibit List for Writ of Mandamus & Prohibition
44. Hybrid Pleading – Revelation #1
44. Hybrid Pleading – Revelation #2
44. Hybrid Pleading – Revelation #3
44. Hybrid Pleading – Revelation #4
44. Hybrid Pleading – Revelation #5
44. Hybrid Pleading – Revelation #6
44. Hybrid Pleading – Revelation #7
45. [Religiosity of Facts #1]
45. [Religiosity of Facts #2]
45. [Religiosity of Facts #3]
45. [Religiosity of Facts #4]
45. [Religiosity of Facts #5]
45. [Religiosity of Facts #6]
45. [Religiosity of Facts #7]
46. Plaintiff Request for Evidentiary Hearing
47. 8th Circuit Appeals Court Ruling
48. 8th Circuit Appeals Mandate
49. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF ACTION
50. Plaintiff’s Memo In Support of re #49
51 Defendants 12(f) Motion to Strike re 44 & 45
52 Defendants Meno In Support for re 51
53. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN OPPOSITION EXTENSION OF TIME re 51
54. Plaintiff Exhibit U#27 13 pages
54. PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO A MOTION TO STRIKE re 51
54. Plaintiff’s MEMO IN SUPPORT re 54 & 53
54.0 Plaintiff Notice of Exhibit U#27 in support re 53
54.1 attachment 1
54.2 attachment 2
54.3 attachment 3
55. Court Order July 11 2017 – AUDREY G. FLEISSIG
56. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER re 55- July 11, 2017
57. PLAINTIFF’S MEMO & BRIEF in Support re 56
58. Exhibit U#28 Protected Speech
58. Exhibit U#29 (A1) The Bad faith in Crafty Bespeaks Defenses
58. Exhibit U#30 (A2) Standard of Moot vs. a Clear Abuse of Discretion
58. Exhibit U#31 (A3) This Court as the adversary, not as the arbiter for justice
58. Exhibit U#32 (D4) Amended Complaint
58. Exhibit U#33 (A5) Misapplication, mistake of law or a manifest error of law or fact
58. Exhibit U#34 (A6) The Merits, Lack of Due Process & stricken from the record
58. Exhibit U#35 (A7) Notice Pleading “Religiosity of Facts”
58. Exhibit U#36 (A5) precedent established by the Rule of Law
58. NOTICE OF EXHIBIT LIST re 56 & 57
58. Plaintiff Exhibits but Clerk Failed to entry all exhibits- attachment 1
60. NOTICE PURSUANT TO JULY 11th, 2017 RULING – NEW CIVIL COVER SHEET
61. A NOTICE to Clerk of Court re 58 FILED 7-28-2017
61. attachment -1 Exhibit U#38 NOTICE OF EXHIBIT LIST re 56
61. attachment -2 Exhibit U#28 Protected Speech
61. attachment -3 Exhibit U#29 (A1) The Bad faith in Crafty Bespeaks Defenses
61. attachment -4 Exhibit U#33 (A5) mistake of law or a manifest error of law or fact
62. PLAINTIFF REPLY TO RE 59 of Defendants response to re 56
63. NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT OF re 62
63.Plaintiff Exhibit Z#1 -GPO- Religion & Free Expression -300 pages
64. Motion for Leave to Construe & Correct the Record
65. Plaintiff’s Memo & Brief in Support of re 64
66. Court’s Memo & Order re 56 8-18-2017
67. Defendants Response to Plaintiff’s Motion re 64
68. INITIAL CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE – May 12th, & March 10th, & February 23rd
69. FOURTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
69.1 FOURTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS – attachment – 1
69.2 FOURTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS – attachment – 2
69.3 FOURTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS – attachment – 3
69.4 FOURTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS – attachment – 4
70. SECOND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE- May 26th, & April 11th, & February 23rd
71. FIFTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
72. THIRD CONSTRUCTIVE – July 11th, & May 5th, & February 23rd
73. SIXTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
74. PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE IN OPPOSITION TO U.S. SUPREME
75. SEVENTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
76. PLAINTIFF’S LEGITIMATE NOTICE AS TO THIS LAWSUIT CAUSE OF ACTION
77. PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS re64
78. LEGITIMATE NOTICE AS TO THIS LAWSUIT WITH THE CIVIL NATURE OF SUIT
79. NOTICE TO CLERK (ECF No. 77) WAS ALTERED, AMENDED OR DEFACED By CLERK
80. Plaintiff Motions DISTRICT COURT ERRED, re 66
81. PLAINTIFF’S MEMO & BRIEF THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED re66
82. UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO DISMISS 12(b)(1) & 12(b)(6)
82.1 attachment 1 [Proposed] ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO DISMISS
83. UNITED STATES MEMO & BRIEF re 82
84. UNITED STATES’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION (ECF NO. 80)
85. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO Rule 12(b)(1) & 12(b)(6) re 82
86. re 85 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO DISMISS
87. Plaintiff Request For Leave re Defendants Reply in re 86
88. Plaintiff’s List of Exhibits for re 88
88.a The United States Constitution Preamble
88.a Plaintiff’s Exhibit U#39- 887 F. 2d 1024 – Ascot Dinner Theatre Ltd v. SBA
88.a Plaintiff’s Exhibit U#40- LASWELL v. BROWN 683 F.2d 261 (1982)
89. Legal Notice of Gov’t Policy on Religious Liberty issued on 10-06-2017
90. attachments – Plaintiff’s Notice of Filing Exhibits in Support of Legal Notice
92. Plaintiff Response to Re 86 Cover Sheet & Tablets
92. Plaintiff’s Response to Re 86 Court Authorized 30 pages
92.5 attachment – EXHIBIT LIST
93. Court Memo & Order – Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG – 12-11-2017
94. Court Order of Dismissal – Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG – 12-11-2017
Dominion Theology triumphs as [To LIVE as EVIL]
1). IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS – EIGHTH CIRCUIT
Cover Sheet & Table of Content & Authorities
2). PETITIONS FOR WRITS- FILED – 2-9-2018 – 7787 words
3). CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND DELIVERY
4). VERIFICATION OF PETITIONS FOR WRITS
Appendix A: Clear and Prejudicial Error of Law and Fact
Appendix B: Fundamental Error
Appendix B-1 Grounds for Reversible Error, Points and Authorities
Appendix C: Reversible Error
Appendix D: “Suing the Federal Government: Sovereignty, Immunity, and Judicial Independence” Professor of Law, Vicki C. Jackson,
Georgetown University Law Center, 35 Geo. Wash. Int’l L. Rev. 521-609 (2003)
Appendix E: Petitioner’s Index List of Plaintiff’s Exhibits (Doc. No. 3)
Appendix E1: Doc. No. 3. Index List of Plaintiff’s Exhibits
Appendix F: Strict Scrutiny Standard of Judicial Review
Appendix F1: Harvard Law Review – STRICT SCRUTINY IN THE MIDDLE FORUM
Appendix G: “Relief from Ultra Vires Governmental Action”,
Marquette Law Review (1959)
Appendix H: Certified Copy of Court Docket Sheet, No. 4:17-CV-750 AGF
Appendix I: Respondent’s oft-repeated error, or manifests a persistent disregard of inter alia.
Appendix I1: Mootness in Judicial Proceedings -Toward a Coherent Theory
Appendix I2: Stare Decisis as Judicial Doctrine – Notre Dame Law School
Appendix J: [Commanding Heights] Quintessential Rights of the First Amendment
Appendix J-1. [Sacred Honor]
Appendix J-2. [Mankind’s Supreme Possessions]
Appendix J-3. As Architects of Religion and Religious Beliefs
Appendix J-4. [conscience]
Appendix J-5. [Constitutionally Protected Interests]
Appendix J-6. [Protected Conduct]
Appendix J-7. [Protected Speech]
Appendix J-8. Immortal Thought of Larry Becraft.
Appendix K: District Court’s Orders and/or Memorandum and Order issued
Appendix L: Petitioner’s Constitutional Protected Interests
Appendix M: Essential Rights as Fundamental Rights or of Unalienable Rights
Appendix N: Rule 15(a)(2) “Other Amendments”
Appendix O: Motions and Briefs Filed by the Petitioner
Appendix P: Motions and Briefs Filed by the Real Party in Interest
Appendix Q: Declarations Filed by Petitioner
13.a FIRST DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
20.a SECOND DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
24. THIRD DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
69. FOURTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
71. FIFTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
73. SIXTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
75. SEVENTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
Appendix R: A Forum for Actions Subject to a Strict Scrutiny Standard of Judicial Review
Appendix S: Petitioner’s Brief in Support of Original Verified Complaint-Petition (Doc. No. 2)
Appendix S1: Doc. No. 2 – Brief in Support of [OVCPetition]
Appendix T: Original Verified Complaint/Petition [OVC/Petition] (Doc. No. 1)
Appendix T1: Doc. No. 1 – [OVCPetition] other case opening documents
Appendix U: Religion and Free Expression – official publication of GPO
Appendix U1: GPO- Religion & Free Expression -300 pages
Appendix V: Face Sheet
Appendix V1: 26 U.S.C. § 5067. Cross reference -Subtitle F shall be given no legal effect
Appendix V1: Face Sheet
Appendix V- Cross References Sections – Exhibit
Appendix V- E-16 Subtitle A-Chapter 2
Appendix V- E-17 Subtitle C-Chapter 21
Appendix V- E-18 Subtitle C-Chapter 23
Appendix V- E-19 Subtitle C-Chapter 24
Appendix V- E-20 Subtitle C-Chapter 25
Appendix V- E-21 Subtitle D-Chapter 35
Appendix V- E-22 Subtitle F –
Appendix W: The Merits of the Case and its Constitutional Claims
Appendix X: Violations of or Encroachments on the Judiciary Act of 1789
Appendix Y: The Taxaonmy of Due Process Manifesting Strict Scrutiny in the Middle Forum
Appendix Y1: Yale Law Review – The One and Only Substantive Due Process Clause
Appendix Z: Petitioner’s Exhibits for Plaintiff’s case
5). PETITIONER’S ADDENDUM OF LAW
6.) Judicial Materials & Law Reviews
Appendix G: “Relief from Ultra Vires Governmental Action” Marquette Law Rev. (1959).
Appendix U: FIRST AMENDMENT– RELIGION AND FREE EXPRESSION Official publication of the Government Printing Office, 300 pages Religion & Free Expression -A Spiritual Stake in First Amendment Values
Appendix Y: “Taxaonmy of Due Process Manifesting Strict Scrutiny in the Middle Forum” The One and Only Substantive Due Process Clause The Yale Law Journal, Ryan C. Williams 120:408 – 2010
7.) Respondent Judge – AUDREY G. FLEISSIG
36. Court Memo & Order – Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG – 5-12-2017 re. #35
42. Court Memo & Order – Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG – 5-26-2017
55. Court Memo & Order – Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG – 7- 11 2017
66. Court Memo & Order Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG re 56 – 8-18-2017
91. COURT ORDER of 10-26-2017 – Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG
93. Court Memo & Order – Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG – 12-11-2017
94. Court Order of Dismissal – Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG – 12-11-2017
7.) THE PANEL – Before WOLLMAN MURPHY and COLLOTON Circuit Judges
No. 18-1299 Judgment 2-16-2018
No. 18-1299 Mandate 2-26-2018
APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR EN BANC HEARING OR FOR PANEL REHEARING
FEDERAL CASE LAW
1. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 1 Cranch 137 137 (1803)
2. United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502 (1954)
3. Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)
4. Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002)
5. Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union, 535 U.S. 564 (2002)
6. California Motor Transp. Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, 404 U.S. 508 (1972)
7. Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 (1972)
8. Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940)
9. Slaughterhouse, Cases 83, U.S. 16, Wall. 36 36 (1872)
10. Chisholm v. Georgia 2, U.S. 2 Dall. 419 419 (1793)
11. Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 37 U.S. 12 Pet. 657 657 (1838)
12. Data Processing Svc. Orgs. v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150 (1970)
TERRY LEE HINDS,
Petitioner,
-v-
“UNITED STATES” GOVERNMENT,
Respondent.
____________________
On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
____________________
PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
____________________
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/17-1612.html
1. PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
2. APPENDIX TABLE OF CONTENTS
3. CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE
4. AFFIDAVIT OF SERVICE
5. Solicitor General – Waiver Letter 17-1612
6. Distributed for Conference of September 24, 2018
7. Petition DENIED – October 1, 2018
8. PETITION FOR REHEARING – filed October 22, 2018
8a. Volume III Appendix (Exhibits) November 19th, 2018
9. Distributed for Conference of November 16, 2018
10. APPLICATION FOR ENFORCEMENT OF PROTECTED SPEECH & DUE PROCESS – filed October 30, 2018
10a. Letter to Clerk of Court
10b. Letter to Solicitor General
10c. Certified Mail
10d. Certificate for Service and Delivery
11. Rehearing DENIED