Free Exercise Clause/Establishment Challenges

//Free Exercise Clause/Establishment Challenges
Free Exercise Clause/Establishment Challenges2018-11-23T21:25:34+00:00

ORIGINAL VERIFIED COMPLAINT FOR
DECLARATORY JUDGEMENT, INJUNCTIVE AND OTHER APPROPRIATE RELIEF
IN THIS PETITION FOR QUINTESSENTIAL RIGHTS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT

1.-OVC-2-16-2017

2.-BRIEF-IN-SUPPORT-OF-OVC-2-16-2017

3.-Index-List-of-Plaintiff’s-Exhibits

4.-Pursuant-to-Local-Rule-2.08
4.-RULE-5.1.-Notice-Constitutional-Challenge-to-Federal-Statute

5. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE 2-21-2017

6.-Motion-to-Amend-Summons-2-21-2017

7.-MEMORANDUM-IN-SUPPORT-OF-AMENDED-SUMMONS

8.-MEMO-ORDER-of-JMB-2-23-2017-JOHN-BODENHAUSEN

9.-PROOF-OF-SERVICE-

10. PROOF OF SERVICE –

11. NOTICE TO THE NATURE OF SUIT IN OPPOSITION TO

12 MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE TO
12. EXH # T-9- I Am- in support of re 11

13. Doc No. 12 – MEMO IN SUPPORT OF TIME TO FILE A RESPONSE
13.a EXH # T-10 In the Nane of JESUS – ADDED BY DECLARATION
13.a EXH # U-7 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR Extension of Time
13.a FIRST DECLARATION OF HINDS

14. PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF OBJECTIONS & OPPOSITION TO re ECF No. 8
14a. EXH # U-8 No. 4 05 CV 1108 ERW 2006 Lawsuit
14a. EXH # U-8 USCOURTS-moed-4_05-cv-01853-1 case 6-6-06

15. NOTICE OF JUDICIAL ASSIGNMENT
15a. Contemporaneously Court Form attached to

16. ORDER of CJRA – 3-8-2017 New Judge- John A. Ross.

17. NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Mokodean

18. COURT Memo & Order Judge JAR 3-10-2017

19. FIRST REQUEST FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RELIEF & MOTION

20. MOTION TO STRIKE ENTRY OF APPEARANCE & NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
20. MEMO & BRIEF in support of re 20. MOTION STRIKE

20.a Exhibit U-#10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE Mokodean
20.a Exhibit U-#11 AO458 Appearance of Counsel
20.a Exhibit U-#12 Taxism – An Institutionalized Faith & Religion H-10
20.a Exhibit U-#13 Temple of Taxism – U S Tax Court H-11
20.a Exhibit U-#14 The Converts of THE-IRS- Taxprayers J-10
20.a Exhibit U-#15 Trial by Ordeal
20.a Exhibit U-#16 SECOND DECLARATION HINDS

21. Return Court Summons – DEFENDANTS & A.G.

22. NOTICE OF (Doc. No. #20)

23. NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBIT U-17
23.a Civil Docket Sheet Exhibit U #11 (4 pages)

24. PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST AND NOTICE FOR A HEARING DATE
24. THIRD DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
24.a NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBIT U-18
24.a T-2 [Mankind’s Supreme Possessions]
24.a T-3 As Architects of Religion and Religious Beliefs
24.a The House of David

25. NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT OF DOC. NO. 20
25.1 Exhibit U-#20 Face Sheet Bird page 1
25.a Exhibit U-#20 Bird of Prey page 2 & 3

26. NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBIT U-19 re (Doc. No. 22)

27. SECOND NOTICE OF APPEARANCE
27.a – Exhibit U#24 – K-36 Black Theology of [Legalism] 2 pagers only
27.a NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT OF
27.a Exhibit U# 26 – B-1 First Amendment
27.a Exhibit U#21 – D- 3 Preamble
27.a Exhibit U#22 The Roles of a Federal District Court
27.a -Exhibit U#23- K-37 Black Theology of Legalism
27.a Exhibit U#25 – L-37 [To LIVE as EVIL] Wicked Law – Face sheet
27.a Exhibit U3#26 page 2 Exhibit Exhibition of Truth
27. a -Exhibit U#24- K-36 Black Theology of [Legalism]

28. FIRST NOTICE OF SHORT & PLAIN

29. COURT ORDER Judge JOHN ROSS 4-11-2017

30. PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE OF A MOTION AND REQUEST FOR A HEARING DATE

31. ORDER – Ross Disqualify himself

32. ORDER of CJRA – 5-5-2017 New Judge- Audrey Flessig

33.1 FIRST NOTICE OF UNJUST BURDENS
33.2 SECOND NOTICE OF UNJUST BURDENS
33.3 THIRD NOTICE OF UNJUST BURDENS
33.4 FOURTH NOTICE OF UNJUST BURDENS
33.5 FIFTH NOTICE OF UNJUST BURDENS
33.6 SIXTH NOTICE OF UNJUST BURDENS
33.7 SEVENTH NOTICE OF UNJUST BURDENS

34.1 FIRST NOTICE OF A SHORT AND PLAIN
34.2 SECOND NOTICE OF A SHORT AND PLAIN
34.3 THIRD NOTICE OF A SHORT AND PLAIN
34.4 FOURTH NOTICE OF A SHORT AND PLAIN
34.5 FIFTH NOTICE OF A SHORT AND PLAIN
34.6 SIXTH NOTICE OF A SHORT AND PLAIN
34.7 SEVENTH NOTICE OF A SHORT AND PLAIN

35. OPPORTUNITY TO PROPERLY PRESENT THE MERITS OF HIS ACTION

36. COURT Memo & Order Judge Flessig 5-12-2017 re. #35

37. A Refusal Letter From the Clerk of Court 5-23-2017
37. Clerk Refused to file -FIRST NOTICE OF JUDICIAL NOTICE #1
37. Refused by Clerk- Exhibit – U- 27 – DOJ Complaint 74 pages
37. Refused by Clerk- Exhibit – U- 28 Docket Sheet Case form 11-19-2011

37. Refused by Clerk- Exhibit – U- 29 Sanctions Imposable for Violations
37. Refused by Clerk- Exhibit – U- 30 – Exhibit List of Plaintiff
37. Refused by Clerk- Exhibit – U- 31 – Oaths of Judges

38. FIRST MOTION TO REVIEW, ALTER, AMEND, OR VACATE ORDERS

39. Exhibit Z#1 – MEMO & ORDER of JMB – attachment 1
39. Exhibit Z#2 – MEMO & ORDER of JAR – attachment 2

39. Exhibit Z#3 – ORDER ROSS 4-11-2017 – JAR – attachment 3
39. Exhibit Z#4 – Exhibit List of Plaintiff – attachment 4
39. Exhibit Z#5 – RULE 8 – 2006 Edition – attachment 5
39. Exhibit Z#6 – RULE 8 – 2016 Edition – attachment 6
39. MEMO OF LAW & BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF re 38

40. First Notice to Present the Merits of Action

41. Notice of Filing Exhibits re Doc. No. 40

42. Court Memo & Order Flessig 5-26-2017

43. FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT – Writ of Mandamus & Prohibition
43.a Exhibit List for Writ of Mandamus & Prohibition

44. Hybrid Pleading – Revelation #1
44. Hybrid Pleading – Revelation #2
44. Hybrid Pleading – Revelation #3
44. Hybrid Pleading – Revelation #4
44. Hybrid Pleading – Revelation #5
44. Hybrid Pleading – Revelation #6
44. Hybrid Pleading – Revelation #7

45. [Religiosity of Facts #1]
45. [Religiosity of Facts #2]
45. [Religiosity of Facts #3]
45. [Religiosity of Facts #4]
45. [Religiosity of Facts #5]
45. [Religiosity of Facts #6]
45. [Religiosity of Facts #7]

46. Plaintiff Request for Evidentiary Hearing

47. 8th Circuit Appeals Court Ruling

48. 8th Circuit Appeals Mandate

49. MOTION FOR CONTINUANCE OF ACTION

50. Plaintiff’s Memo In Support of re #49

51 Defendants 12(f) Motion to Strike re 44 & 45

52 Defendants Meno In Support for re 51

53. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION IN OPPOSITION EXTENSION OF TIME re 51

54. Plaintiff Exhibit U#27 13 pages
54. PLAINTIFF’S OPPOSITION TO A MOTION TO STRIKE re 51
54. Plaintiff’s MEMO IN SUPPORT re 54 & 53
54.0 Plaintiff Notice of Exhibit U#27 in support re 53
54.1 attachment 1
54.2 attachment 2
54.3 attachment 3

55. Court Order July 11 2017 – AUDREY G. FLEISSIG

56. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO RECONSIDER re 55- July 11, 2017

57. PLAINTIFF’S MEMO & BRIEF in Support re 56

58. Exhibit U#28 Protected Speech
58. Exhibit U#29 (A1) The Bad faith in Crafty Bespeaks Defenses
58. Exhibit U#30 (A2) Standard of Moot vs. a Clear Abuse of Discretion
58. Exhibit U#31 (A3) This Court as the adversary, not as the arbiter for justice
58. Exhibit U#32 (D4) Amended Complaint
58. Exhibit U#33 (A5) Misapplication, mistake of law or a manifest error of law or fact
58. Exhibit U#34 (A6) The Merits, Lack of Due Process & stricken from the record
58. Exhibit U#35 (A7) Notice Pleading “Religiosity of Facts”
58. Exhibit U#36 (A5) precedent established by the Rule of Law
58. NOTICE OF EXHIBIT LIST re 56 & 57
58. Plaintiff Exhibits but Clerk Failed to entry all exhibits- attachment 1

59. Defendants Response to Plaintiff’s Motion re 56

60. NOTICE PURSUANT TO JULY 11th, 2017 RULING – NEW CIVIL COVER SHEET

61. A NOTICE to Clerk of Court re 58 FILED 7-28-2017
61. attachment -1 Exhibit U#38 NOTICE OF EXHIBIT LIST re 56
61. attachment -2 Exhibit U#28 Protected Speech
61. attachment -3 Exhibit U#29 (A1) The Bad faith in Crafty Bespeaks Defenses
61. attachment -4 Exhibit U#33 (A5) mistake of law or a manifest error of law or fact

62. PLAINTIFF REPLY TO RE 59 of Defendants response to re 56

63. NOTICE OF FILING EXHIBIT IN SUPPORT OF re 62
63.Plaintiff Exhibit Z#1 -GPO- Religion & Free Expression -300 pages

64. Motion for Leave to Construe & Correct the Record

65. Plaintiff’s Memo & Brief in Support of re 64

66. Court’s Memo & Order re 56 8-18-2017

67. Defendants Response to Plaintiff’s Motion re 64

68. INITIAL CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE – May 12th, & March 10th, & February 23rd

69. FOURTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
69.1 FOURTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS – attachment – 1
69.2 FOURTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS – attachment – 2
69.3 FOURTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS – attachment – 3
69.4 FOURTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS – attachment – 4

70. SECOND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE- May 26th, & April 11th, & February 23rd

71. FIFTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS

72. THIRD CONSTRUCTIVE – July 11th, & May 5th, & February 23rd

73. SIXTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS

74. PLAINTIFF’S FOURTH CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE IN OPPOSITION TO U.S. SUPREME

75. SEVENTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS

76. PLAINTIFF’S LEGITIMATE NOTICE AS TO THIS LAWSUIT CAUSE OF ACTION

77. PLAINTIFF’S REPLY TO DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS re64

78. LEGITIMATE NOTICE AS TO THIS LAWSUIT WITH THE CIVIL NATURE OF SUIT

79. NOTICE TO CLERK (ECF No. 77) WAS ALTERED, AMENDED OR DEFACED By CLERK

80. Plaintiff Motions DISTRICT COURT ERRED, re 66

81. PLAINTIFF’S MEMO & BRIEF THE DISTRICT COURT ERRED re66

82. UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO DISMISS 12(b)(1) & 12(b)(6)
82.1 attachment 1 [Proposed] ORDER GRANTING UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO DISMISS

83. UNITED STATES MEMO & BRIEF re 82

84. UNITED STATES’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION (ECF NO. 80)

85. PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO Rule 12(b)(1) & 12(b)(6) re 82

86. re 85 REPLY IN SUPPORT OF UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO DISMISS

87. Plaintiff Request For Leave re Defendants Reply in re 86

88. Plaintiff’s List of Exhibits for re 88

88.a The United States Constitution Preamble

88.a Plaintiff’s Exhibit U#39- 887 F. 2d 1024 – Ascot Dinner Theatre Ltd v. SBA

88.a Plaintiff’s Exhibit U#40- LASWELL v. BROWN 683 F.2d 261 (1982)

89. Legal Notice of Gov’t Policy on Religious Liberty issued on 10-06-2017

90. attachments – Plaintiff’s Notice of Filing Exhibits in Support of Legal Notice

90. Exhibit V#1 – 1 page

90. Exhibit V#2 – 25 pages

90. Exhibit V#3 – 2 pages

90. Exhibit V#4 – 3 pages

91. COURT ORDER of 10-26-2017

92. Plaintiff Response to Re 86 Cover Sheet & Tablets

92. Plaintiff’s Response to Re 86 Court Authorized 30 pages

92.1 attachment – Appendix A

92.2 attachment – Appendix B

92.3 attachment – Appendix C

92.4 attachment – Appendix D

92.5 attachment – EXHIBIT LIST

93. Court Memo & Order – Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG – 12-11-2017

94. Court Order of Dismissal – Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG – 12-11-2017

Dominion Theology triumphs as [To LIVE as EVIL]

1). IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS – EIGHTH CIRCUIT
       Cover Sheet & Table of Content & Authorities

2). PETITIONS FOR WRITS- FILED – 2-9-2018 – 7787 words

3). CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE AND DELIVERY

4). VERIFICATION OF PETITIONS FOR WRITS

Appendix A: Clear and Prejudicial Error of Law and Fact
Appendix B: Fundamental Error
Appendix B-1 Grounds for Reversible Error, Points and Authorities
Appendix C: Reversible Error
Appendix D: “Suing the Federal Government: Sovereignty, Immunity, and Judicial Independence” Professor of Law, Vicki C. Jackson,
Georgetown University Law Center, 35 Geo. Wash. Int’l L. Rev. 521-609 (2003)

Appendix E: Petitioner’s Index List of Plaintiff’s Exhibits (Doc. No. 3)
Appendix E1: Doc. No. 3. Index List of Plaintiff’s Exhibits
Appendix F: Strict Scrutiny Standard of Judicial Review
Appendix F1: Harvard Law Review – STRICT SCRUTINY IN THE MIDDLE FORUM

Appendix G: Relief from Ultra Vires Governmental Action”,
Marquette Law Review (1959)

Appendix H: Certified Copy of Court Docket Sheet, No. 4:17-CV-750 AGF
Appendix I: Respondent’s oft-repeated error, or manifests a persistent disregard of inter alia.
Appendix I1: Mootness in Judicial Proceedings -Toward a Coherent Theory
Appendix I2: Stare Decisis as Judicial Doctrine – Notre Dame Law School
Appendix J: [Commanding Heights] Quintessential Rights of the First Amendment
Appendix J-1. [Sacred Honor]

Appendix J-2. [Mankind’s Supreme Possessions]
Appendix J-3. As Architects of Religion and Religious Beliefs
Appendix J-4. [conscience]
Appendix J-5. [Constitutionally Protected Interests]
Appendix J-6. [Protected Conduct]
Appendix J-7. [Protected Speech]
Appendix J-8. Immortal Thought of Larry Becraft.
Appendix K: District Court’s Orders and/or Memorandum and Order issued
Appendix L: Petitioner’s Constitutional Protected Interests
Appendix M: Essential Rights as Fundamental Rights or of Unalienable Rights
Appendix N: Rule 15(a)(2) “Other Amendments”
Appendix O: Motions and Briefs Filed by the Petitioner
Appendix P: Motions and Briefs Filed by the Real Party in Interest
Appendix Q:
Declarations Filed by Petitioner

13.a FIRST DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
20.a SECOND DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
24. THIRD DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
69. FOURTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
71. FIFTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
73. SIXTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS
75. SEVENTH DECLARATION OF TERRY LEE HINDS

Appendix R: A Forum for Actions Subject to a Strict Scrutiny Standard of Judicial Review
Appendix S: Petitioner’s Brief in Support of Original Verified Complaint-Petition (Doc. No. 2)
Appendix S1: Doc. No. 2 – Brief in Support of [OVCPetition]
Appendix T: Original Verified Complaint/Petition [OVC/Petition] (Doc. No. 1)
Appendix T1: Doc. No. 1 – [OVCPetition] other case opening documents
Appendix U: Religion and Free Expression – official publication of GPO
Appendix U1: GPO- Religion & Free Expression -300 pages

Appendix V: Face Sheet
Appendix V1: 26 U.S.C. § 5067. Cross reference -Subtitle F shall be given no legal effect
Appendix V1: Face Sheet

Appendix V- Cross References Sections – Exhibit
Appendix V- E-16 Subtitle A-Chapter 2
Appendix V- E-17 Subtitle C-Chapter 21
Appendix V- E-18 Subtitle C-Chapter 23
Appendix V- E-19 Subtitle C-Chapter 24
Appendix V- E-20 Subtitle C-Chapter 25
Appendix V- E-21 Subtitle D-Chapter 35
Appendix V- E-22 Subtitle F –

Appendix W: The Merits of the Case and its Constitutional Claims
Appendix X: Violations of or Encroachments on the Judiciary Act of 1789
Appendix Y: The Taxaonmy of Due Process Manifesting Strict Scrutiny in the Middle Forum
Appendix Y1: Yale Law Review – The One and Only Substantive Due Process Clause
Appendix Z:
Petitioner’s Exhibits for Plaintiff’s case

5). PETITIONER’S ADDENDUM OF LAW

6.) Judicial Materials & Law Reviews

Appendix D: “Suing the Federal Government: Sovereignty, Immunity, and Judicial Independence” Professor of Law, Vicki C. Jackson, Georgetown University Law Center, 35 Geo. Wash.Int’l L. Rev. 521-609 (2003) 

Appendix F: Strict Scrutiny in the Middle Forum” Harvard Law Review Vol. 122, No. 8 (Jun., 2009), pp. 2140-2161 Published by: The Harvard Law Review Association

Appendix G: “Relief from Ultra Vires Governmental Action” Marquette Law Rev. (1959).

Appendix U: FIRST AMENDMENT– RELIGION AND FREE EXPRESSION Official publication of the Government Printing Office, 300 pages Religion & Free Expression -A Spiritual Stake in First Amendment Values

 Appendix Y: Taxaonmy of Due Process Manifesting Strict Scrutiny in the Middle Forum” The One and Only Substantive Due Process Clause The Yale Law Journal, Ryan C. Williams 120:408 – 2010

Appendix I:California Law Review VOL. 62 December 1974 No. 5 Mootness in Judicial Proceedings: Toward a Coherent Theory Don B. Kates, Jr. and William T. Barker

Appendix I:Notre Dame Law School Scholarly Works Faculty Scholarshi 1-1-2010 Stare Decisis as Judicial Doctrine Randy J. Kozel  Notre Dame Law School, rkozel@nd.edu

7.) Respondent Judge – AUDREY G. FLEISSIG

36. Court Memo & Order – Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG – 5-12-2017 re. #35
42. Court Memo & Order – Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG – 5-26-2017
55. Court Memo & Order – Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG – 7- 11 2017
66. Court Memo & Order Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG re 56 – 8-18-2017
91. COURT ORDER of 10-26-2017 – Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG
93. Court Memo & Order – Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG – 12-11-2017
94. Court Order of Dismissal – Judge AUDREY G. FLEISSIG – 12-11-2017

7.) THE PANEL – Before WOLLMAN MURPHY and COLLOTON Circuit Judges

No. 18-1299 Judgment 2-16-2018
No. 18-1299 Mandate 2-26-2018
APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR EN BANC HEARING OR FOR PANEL REHEARING

FEDERAL CASE LAW

1. Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 1 Cranch 137 137 (1803)
2. United States v. Morgan, 346 U.S. 502 (1954)
3. Yick Wo v. Hopkins, 118 U.S. 356 (1886)
4. Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002)
5. Ashcroft v. American Civil Liberties Union, 535 U.S. 564 (2002)
6. California Motor Transp. Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, 404 U.S. 508 (1972)
7. Perry v. Sindermann, 408 U.S. 593 (1972)
8. Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940)
9. Slaughterhouse, Cases 83, U.S. 16, Wall. 36 36 (1872)
10. Chisholm v. Georgia 2, U.S. 2 Dall. 419 419 (1793)
11. Rhode Island v. Massachusetts, 37 U.S. 12 Pet. 657 657 (1838)
12. Data Processing Svc. Orgs. v. Camp, 397 U.S. 150 (1970)

TERRY LEE HINDS,
Petitioner,
-v-
“UNITED STATES” GOVERNMENT,
Respondent.
____________________

On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the
United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
____________________

PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI
____________________
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/17-1612.html